Pages

Showing posts with label Precedents. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Precedents. Show all posts

11.19.2014

Cathedral of Cordoba



The Mosque–Cathedral of Córdoba, also called the Mezquita, is a medieval Islamic mosque that was converted into a Catholic Christian cathedral in the Spanish city of Córdoba, Andalusia.
The actual state of the building sums up an impressive layering of different epochs, styles and religious types apparently starting with a temple dedicated to Janus, the first structure which occupied the site.
mezquita-cordoba-02
The Christian Church of St. Vincent in Cordoba was erected on the vestigia of the ancient temple and after the Islamic conquest of the Visigothic Kingdom, the building was divided between the Muslims and Christians. When the exiled Umayyad prince Abd al-Rahman I escaped to Spain and defeated the governor of Al-Andalus he purchased the Christian half of the church and then built a mosque over the exhisting structure.
The mosque began as a nearly square construction comprised of an outer-courtyard and a covered prayer hall and underwent numerous subsequent changes during almost two hundred years while maintaining a substantial coherence in style. The main feature of the building is the hall, a non-hierarchical, almost abstract space with a system of columns and arches extending in all directions in a strict grid. This arrangement let it possible to expand the mosque plan according to the growth of the community in a coherent way.
This arcaded hypostyle hall, in its final form, is composed of a “forest” of 856 columns of jasper, onyx, marble, and granite supporting red and white arches. The columns were obtained from the Roman temple which had occupied the site previously, as well as from other destroyed Roman buildings, such as the Mérida amphitheatre. The double arches consist of a lower horseshoe arch and an upper semi-circular arch, a technical solution which allowed higher ceilings that would otherwise be possible only with relatively low columns.
mezquita-cordoba-01
mezquita-cordoba-04

mezquita-cordoba-03

The mosque incorporated a number of Roman columns with capitals. Some of the columns were already in the Gothic structure while others were sent from various quarters of Spain as presents from the governors of provinces. The main hall was used for a variety of purposes: it served as a central Prayer Hall for personal devotion, the daily Muslim prayers and the special Friday prayers. It also would have served as a hall for teaching and for Sharia law cases during the rule of Abd al-Rahman and his successors.
Several other elements were added through time: Abd al-Rahman II ordered a new minaret, while Al-Hakam II, in 961, enlarged the building and enriched the Mihrab. The last of the reforms was carried out by Al-Mansur Ibn Abi Aamir in 987. It was connected to the Caliph’s palace by a raised walk-way, mosques within the palaces being the tradition for previous Islamic rulers. The Mezquita reached its current dimensions in 987 with the completion of the outer naves and courtyard.
When Christian forces reconquered the city in the 13th century, under Ferdinand III, the mosque was converted into a cathedral, through some modifications: the opening between the courtyard and the prayer hall was walled, retaining only one entrance door. In addition, some rows of columns were demolished to allow free space for the Royal Chapel decorated with Mudejar stucco. In the 16th Century the clergy of Cordoba decided to increase the size of the Cathedral: the new project consisted in the demolition of an important part of the forest of columns and the insertion of a Christian cathedral grandly combining Gothic, Renaissance and Baroque styles, although alterating forever the unity of the Muslim building.
The project found initially a strong opposition and was completed only after the intercession of Charles V, who, nonetheless despised the results. However, it was probably for the inclusion of the Church that the rest of the original building survived to the devastating fury of Church and local nobility, fiercely hostile to conserve any trace of the Muslim past presence in Spain.
After the modifications, the non-hierarchical field of the mosque, with its rows of columns streching in all directions, found itself engaged in a dialectical relationship – based on striking contrast and subtle dialogue –  with the organisational logic of the medieval cathedral.

mezquita-cordoba-14

mezquita-cordoba-15

mezquita-cordoba-07


mezquita-cordoba-10

mezquita-cordoba-16

mezquita-cordoba-11

mezquita-cordoba-12

mezquita-cordoba-13

Engravings from:
Murphy, James Cavanah, 1760-1814. / The Arabian antiquities of Spain (1815) (free download of the plates from this link) (Via Tectonica Blog)
Further reading:
Learner
Mosque-Cathedral of Cordoba on Wikipedia. (incomplete survey)

http://socks-studio.com/2014/04/11/the-field-and-the-nave-the-mezquita-of-cordoba/

9.05.2014

조선의 가구






조선의 가구 VS 북유럽 가구
 어느 때보다 북유럽 가구가 대세를 이루고 있습니다.
사용자를 배려하면서도 친환경적이어서 심플하면서도 감성적인 공간을 추구하는 현대인의 취향과 잘 어울리기 때문인데요.
조선시대에 한국 목가구는 순박한 디자인에 자연과 조화를 이루려는 심성이 더해져
중국이나 일본 등과 구분되는 한국만의 독창적인 가구 양식을 만들어냈습니다.
두 가구 모두 주변 사물과 잘 어울리면서 탁월한 존재감을 갖고 있다는 공통점이 있습니다.
조선 가구와 북유럽 가구가 탄생한 배경과 그에 담긴 철학미적 표현방식을 살펴볼까요?
(좌)평안도 숭숭이 반닫이(사진 제공고도사)
(우)Side board(비투프로젝트 소장|340만원|1960년대 제작)

자연과 삶의 철학이 녹아 있는 북유럽 가구북유럽 가구의 특징은 따뜻함과 우아함으로, 재료와 형태를 자연에서 차용했기 때문인데요.
혹독한 자연환경을 극복하기 위해 나무와 패브릭, 동물의 털이나 가죽 등의 천연재료를 
사용해 편안하고 따뜻한 느낌으로 가구들을 배치했습니다.
북유럽에서는 나무가 다른 자원에 비해 풍부한 편인데 특히 스웨덴과 핀란드의 자작나무와 소나무, 
덴마크산 너도밤나무로 제작한 의자와 테이블, 캐비닛 등이 현대 북유럽 스타일의 가구들을 대표하고 있습니다.​
(좌)Rosewood desk(빈트 소장 | 가격 미정 | 1958년 제작)
(우)Diplomat chair(비투프로젝트 소장 | 350만원 | 1960년대 제작)
현대가구의 전형을 이루게 된 북유럽 가구
북유럽 가구는 현대가구사의 흐름에 두 가지 큰 영향을 끼치게 됩니다.
첫째, 현대가구의 표본을 탄생시켰다는 점입니다. 
대표적인 디자이너로는 덴마크의 카레 클린트(Kaare Klint) 와 한스 베그너(Hans J. Wegner) 등이 있습니다.
이들은 재료가 가진 성질을 충분히 활용해 전통을 재해석하는 모습을 보여
시대를 초월한 독창적인 아름다운 가구를 창조했습니다.
둘째, 합판 곡목기술을 통해‘우아한 기능주의’의 시대를 열었다는 점입니다. 
핀란드의 건축가 알바 알토(Alvar Aalto)는 합판 곡목기술로 북유럽의 자연을 우아한 곡선으로 형상화하여 기능주의에 접목시켰고,
이러한 알바 알토의 성공은 높은 수준의 가구를 일반인들도 누릴 수 있게 해 준 중요한 전환점입니다.​
 (좌)와이 체어
중국의 명나라 의자에서 영감을 받아 디자인 한 한스 베그너의 와이 체어.(사진 제공: Dansk Møbelkunst Gallery)
(우)넘버 포티투
너도밤나무와 자작나무 합판을 곡목하여 만든 알바 알토의 캔틸레버 의자.(사진 제공: Jacksons)

소박한 대중의 삶이 묻어나는 조선 목가구
조선 목가구는 일상용품들을 주제로 다루며 서민의 생활정서를 반영하고 있습니다.
산맥이 가로막은 관계로 주변에서 구하기 쉽고 러모로 옹골찬 성질을 지닌 소나무로 목조주택을 짓게 되었는데요.
겨울을 나기 위한 방편으로 구들을 깔아 만든 온돌로 인해 낮은 벽면과 창호로 만들어진 여백이 나오게 되었고
평좌식이라는 생활문화를 낳게 됩니다.
서양과 달리 우리나라는 벽면에는 낮고 아담한 규모의 장이나 농사방탁자문갑 등을 배치하여 옷이나 책 등을 보관하고
서안연상소반 등을 온기가 모이는 방 한가운데 배치해 이동성을 좋게 만들었습니다.
무늬가 좋은 판재를 2~3mm 가량 얇게 켠 후 수축팽창이 적은 잘 마른 오동나무나 소나무 판재를 뒤쪽에 엇갈려 붙인 얇은 부판을 만들고 기둥과 쇠목동자 등 힘을 받는 골재에 끼워놓기 위해 쥐벽칸머름칸의 면분할 방법을 창안했습니다.
삼층장
골재는 단단한 나무를 사용하고 복판재는 부판기법으로
 제작한 먹감나무 판재를 대칭시켜 마치 추상화를 보는 듯하다.
둥근 놋쇠장석을 짜임새 있게 구성하여 화사함을 강조했다.
(사진 제공고도사)
조선목가구의 독자적인 조형양식 사방탁자와 소반
전통 목가구의 생명은 못을 사용하지 않고 나무와 나무만을 결합하는 짜맞춤에 있습니다.
이 결합방법은 수십 가지가 존재하며 목수의 아이디어에 따라 얼마든지 더 다양하게 응용할 수 있는데요.
조선 목가구가 단순하면서도 튼튼하고 아름다운 이유입니다. 
이러한 짜맞춤의 결정체가 사방탁자입니다.
조선시대의 유교사상은 생활공간을 안방과 사랑방으로 철저히 분리해 사랑방의 주인인 선비들은
자신들의 철학을 가구에 담아 절제비와 비례미가 응축된 사방탁자를 탄생시키게 됩니다.
사방탁자
여백의 미를 살린 사방탁자는 조선 목가구의 독창적인 양식
이며 소장품의 배치에 따라 또 다른 예술품으로 완성된다.
하단을 풍혈로 장식했다.
(사진 제공본태박물관)


20세기에는 의자가 서양가구의 아이콘이라면 조선시대에는 단연 소반입니다.
좌식 문화에 뿌리를 둔 가구로서 중국의 영향을 거의 받지 않은 고유한 문화유산입니다.
의자도 그러하겠지만 소반 역시 서민부터 상류층에 이르기까지 다양한 계층의 삶의 애환과 역사가 담겨있습니다.
그 모든 디자인이 본연의 역할에 충실하게 되어 있어 ‘작은 건축’이라 불리기도 합니다.
()나주반(사진 제공국립중앙박물관)
()흑칠 원반(사진 제공본태박물관)

생활정서에 바탕을 둔 미감
조선 목가구가 갖는 차별적인 특징은 한국의 생활정서에 바탕을 둔 미감이라 할 수 있습니다.
예를 들면 자연목의 뒤틀림 방지 구조로부터 출발한 쥐벽칸머름칸 등의 분할이 보여주는 독창적 비례미,
다양한 금구장식에서 표현되는 길상사상 등은 한국인의 정서를 잘 담아내고 있는데요.
한국 전통가옥의 구조 및 기능과 미를 갖춘 조선 목가구는 세계시장에서 경쟁력을 갖추는데 손색이 없는 요소를 가지고 있습니다.
문화적인 고유성을 살리는 가운데 시대요구를 수용하여 재창작해낸다면
 북유럽 가구 못지 않는 한국 가구의 세계화도 가능하지 않을까요?
(좌) 떡살(사진 제공: 고도사)
(우) 이층농(사진 제공: 고도사)


http://blog.naver.com/woodplanet/220112288061



8.29.2014

알토의 건물 내뷰를 감상하기.

https://www.google.com/maps/views/streetview/alvar-aalto-architecture?gl=us


구글에서 제공하는 알바알토 건물내부..

6.10.2014

"the end" of Rem & word, grammar vs. architecture, elements

http://www.dezeen.com/2014/06/09/rem-koolhaas-at-the-end-of-career-says-peter-eisenman/



Rem Koolhaas is stating "the end" of his career, says Peter Eisenman




Valentina Ciuffi: Let's talk about Elements [the exhibition occupying the Central Pavilion at the Venice Architecture Biennale]. You've known Rem from the very beginning – what do you think of the core show at his biennale?
Peter Eisenman: First of all, any language is grammar. The thing that changes from Italian to English is not the words being different, but grammar. So, if architecture is to be considered a language, 'elements' don't matter. I mean, whatever the words are, they're all the same. So for me what's missing [from the show], purposely missing, is the grammatic.
Look, 50 years ago, we knew that Modernism was dead. Le Corbusier, Mies van der Rohe, Frank Lloyd Wright: all dead. We didn't know what the future was but we knew all this was dead.
In '68 we found out what the future was going to be: the revolution in '68 in the schools, in culture, in art etc: all was changed. We are now 50 years from '64 and the totemic figure of these 50 years, the symbolic figure? Rem Koolhaas, right?
Rem Koolhaas presents the Biennale as la fine [the end]: "The end of my career, the end of my hegemony, the end of my mythology, the end of everything, the end of architecture." Because we don't have architects [in the biennale]. We have performance, we have film, we have video; we have everything but architecture.
So Rem is saying: "You know, I want to say: I don't do this, I don't do this, I don't do this, but I also want to tell you that I don't want you to tell me my end. I'm telling you the end." He makes the point, bonk, like that.
Valentina Ciuffi: He's stating his end?
Peter Eisenman: He's stating his end. And he's finished. And we don't know what's coming in four five years. 2018, like 1968, could be a revolution. Who knows?
Valentina Ciuffi: So this end is the start of something new?
Peter Eisenman: Always. History always goes like this.
Valentina Ciuffi: But when he says no to archistars, yes to architecture… 
Peter Eisenman: He is the archistar! He is the origin of the archistar. He was there at the beginning.
Valentina Ciuffi: You taught all the archistars. They all came from your academy [the Institute for Architecture and Urban Studies in New York].
Peter Eisenman: He is the archistar and now he is the curator star. He's killed all the archistars, and now he is going [to be the] single curator star.
Valentina Ciuffi: You are one of the few people able to be so straight with him because…
Peter Eisenman: I know him very well. We started together way back. I helped publish his first book. I got the money to publish Delirious New York, I was on the jury that gave him the first prize he ever won for his architecture. I gave him an office where to write Delirious New York, so I know Rem from the beginning.
Valentina Ciuffi: So you think this idea of taking elements and not thinking about the grammar is totally…
Peter Eisenman: Well it's Rem. It's Rem because he doesn't believe in grammar. That's Rem, and that's good. Look, when he was at the Architecture Association School in 1972, in the spring of '72 when he quit – because he never finish school, you have to understand – because he went to the new director and he said, quote: "I want to learn fundamentals. Where can I learn fundamentals?"
And the director looked at him and said: "We don't teach fundamentals here. We teach language." And then he quit. So there is a relationship between quitting the school in 1972 and Fundamentals today. Okay?
Valentina Ciuffi: You are perhaps one of the the few people who can be so direct about Rem.
Peter Eisenman: I love Rem. I think it's very important to have lived in the time of Rem, like to have lived in the time of Corbusier. In '62 I went to Paris and I stood on the doorstep of Le Corbusier's atelier at 35 rue de Sèvres with my mentor Colin Rowe. He said, "Ring the doorbell!" And I said: "What I'm going to say to this guy? What am I doing here?"
And I think that students today feel the same way about the mythology of Koolhaas: "What am I going to say to him?" So very few people would challenge him. If you ask him questions; yesterday at the press conference people were asking him questions and he said: "I don't answer questions like this. You should stop asking questions."
So he's a very, very clear and a good person to put this biennale on. And sarà la fine dell'architecttura [it will be the end of architecture].


11.23.2013

the Architecture of Kindergardens

Kindergarten Design by CEBRA


This new kindergarten design in Vonsild by the Danish architectural firm CEBRAattempts to provide a learning expience for young children stimulating their curiosity and creativity, the architecture facilitating this through play.

"Using the building should be educational and this is why we have deliberately avoided typical building features. The children should learn from this very early stage that a house does not have to look like the typical child drawing with a pitch roof, a door in the middle and a window on each side of it. This building has a jagged roof, it has no corners since everything is rounded and the main volumes have very few right angles. The kindergarten will demonstrate quite effectively that a building can look anyway you want it to." - The Architects

It is the architects' drawings which I find greatly interesting - and shows the rigorous thought process that went into the design. Here is my interpretation of these:


The perceived scale of objects.


The experience or 'journey' through a village - the various 'parts'.


The play of light and shadow.


The different movements through space.


Learning about colour.


Abstract objects versus 'real' objects - for children to interact with.


Surfaces for children to interact with - draw on.


Varying types and sizes of space.




Love the wee detail of Michelangelo's 'Creation' on the ceiling.


Shows a partition opening serving as a link to the second floor and letting light to flood in.


The curving outer wall serves as a roll of paper for children to display their creative works on.


The various 'blobs' serving different activities.


The graduation from interior space to exterior (or landscaped) outdoor space.




Taking the traditional monopitched roof of the house and translating it as a light feature, the jagged form contrasting with the organic and flowing of the outer walls.


Each 'blob' being utilised for a separate activity.


Entrances and exits.

 
A section showing thermal qualities - light penetration and air flow.


Site plan - shows how the 'blobs' gradually break down and fade into the landscape.





The finished building:




Not quite as successful as I would have hoped. It is a shame that the choice of materials are somewhat bland, sterile and cold. The landscaping is nice, with the grassy mounds and curving paths. Would like to see some photos of the building in use!


Once again the interior's choice of materiality is less than inspiring with the drab vinyl coloured flooring.




The architects here are fairly successful in realising the potentiality for play in kindergarten architecture. However, as it seems with many contemporary examples the architectural environment lacks warmth - a quality that is important for the care and nurturing of young children. The qualities that induce feelings of 'homeliness' and stability.

http://www.thearchitectureofearlychildhood.com/2011/07/kindergarten-design-by-cebra.html